| Bush to sign four orders
to lessen unions' political power
LABOR LEADERS SAY ACTION LOOKS LIKE GOP RETALIATION
One would require that government
contractors post notices reminding workers that they have the right to
withhold dues money for anything except purely labor-related activity,
such as collective bargaining, meaning they could refuse to contribute
to union political activities.
Another would prohibit ``project labor
agreements,'' which guarantee union labor on federal works in exchange
for a promise not to strike. The third would eliminate protections in
federal contracts for service workers. And the fourth would abolish the
National Partnership Council, created in the Clinton administration to
help federal managers and employee unions work together.
In addition, the General Services
Administration is telling federal agencies to delay a procurement change
that would stop federal money from going to any contractor who violates
labor laws.
Labor leaders say publicly that they
are eager to work with the White House and Congress. But privately they
hold no illusions.
``They're going to try to hurt us,''
said one union president, who spoke on condition of anonymity during a
break in the AFL-CIO's annual winter meeting in Los Angeles.
White House officials deny political
retaliation. But other Republicans say union leaders invited trouble by
putting so much effort into helping Democrats in the last election.
In last year's election, unions poured
money and personnel into Democratic campaigns. People from union
households represented 26 percent of the total vote, an all-time high
despite stagnant union membership. They voted Democratic by a rate of
2-1.
``It's hard to argue that they don't
deserve a payback,'' said Keith Appell, a veteran GOP strategist. ``They
have to understand, if they want to work with Republicans, they can't be
the grass-roots arm of the Democratic National Committee. As long as
they are the ground troops for the Democrats, they can't expect
Republicans to embrace them.''
``We can see a pattern directed at
labor in a political sense,'' said Robin Gerber, a former political
director for the carpenters union and a senior fellow at the University
of Maryland's James MacGregor Burns Academy of Leadership. ``I don't
think Republicans are out to destroy labor as a movement. But they have
an interest in weakening labor's political power.''
Labor leaders also fear that Bush may
be considering other punitive proposals. One would require overtime pay
only after 80 hours in a two-week period rather than after 40 hours in a
one-week period. The other, vetoed by President Clinton in 1996, would
allow businesses to create competing organizations to rival unions.
In addition, Bush insists that any
campaign-finance measure such as the one proposed by Sens. John McCain,
R-Ariz., and Russ Feingold, D-Wis., must include a provision that would
require unions to get permission from workers before using their dues
money for political purposes. |